dissolved macrogol Search Results


90
Klean Industries macrogol/electrolytes
Macrogol/Electrolytes, supplied by Klean Industries, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/macrogol+3350/pmc08222733-116-12-13
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
macrogol/electrolytes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FUJIFILM 0.125% (v/v) polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monoolate (polysorbate 80)
0.125% (V/V) Polyoxyethylene (20) Sorbitan Monoolate (Polysorbate 80), supplied by FUJIFILM, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/0+125+++v+v++polyoxyethylene++20++sorbitan+monoolate++polysorbate+80+/pm28280214-259-9-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
0.125% (v/v) polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monoolate (polysorbate 80) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BASF macrogol 15 hydroxystearate
Macrogol 15 Hydroxystearate, supplied by BASF, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/solutol+hs+15/pmc04370917-147-6-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
macrogol 15 hydroxystearate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
honeywell international polyethylene glycol (peg) with an average molecular weight of 10,000 da
Polyethylene Glycol (Peg) With An Average Molecular Weight Of 10,000 Da, supplied by honeywell international, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/polyethylene+glycol/pm36736271-84-9-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyethylene glycol (peg) with an average molecular weight of 10,000 da - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress mk 4482
a Hamsters were intranasally infected with <t>SARS-CoV-2.</t> <t>MK-4482</t> was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.
Mk 4482, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/Molnupiravir/pmc08052374-151-5-8
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mk 4482 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SunBio Inc polyethylene glycol diacrylate pegda 3.4 kd
a Hamsters were intranasally infected with <t>SARS-CoV-2.</t> <t>MK-4482</t> was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.
Polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate Pegda 3.4 Kd, supplied by SunBio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/poly+ethylene+glycol++diacrylate+pegda/pmc03501122-127-7-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyethylene glycol diacrylate pegda 3.4 kd - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BASF cremophor
a Hamsters were intranasally infected with <t>SARS-CoV-2.</t> <t>MK-4482</t> was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.
Cremophor, supplied by BASF, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/cremophor+el+/pm16896350-96-11-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cremophor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Avantor polyethylene glycol 300 (peg300
a Hamsters were intranasally infected with <t>SARS-CoV-2.</t> <t>MK-4482</t> was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.
Polyethylene Glycol 300 (Peg300, supplied by Avantor, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/polyethylene+glycol+300++peg300/pmc03056641-59-8-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyethylene glycol 300 (peg300 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FUJIFILM polyoxyethylene (10) nonyl phenyl ether (npe
a Hamsters were intranasally infected with <t>SARS-CoV-2.</t> <t>MK-4482</t> was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.
Polyoxyethylene (10) Nonyl Phenyl Ether (Npe, supplied by FUJIFILM, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/ripa+buffer/us10000791-171-27-35
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyoxyethylene (10) nonyl phenyl ether (npe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Merck KGaA polyoxyethylene—octylphenyl ether
a Hamsters were intranasally infected with <t>SARS-CoV-2.</t> <t>MK-4482</t> was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.
Polyoxyethylene—Octylphenyl Ether, supplied by Merck KGaA, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/tx+100/pmc02701165-189-13-15
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyoxyethylene—octylphenyl ether - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FUJIFILM peg 6000
a Hamsters were intranasally infected with <t>SARS-CoV-2.</t> <t>MK-4482</t> was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.
Peg 6000, supplied by FUJIFILM, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/peg+6000/pm19336948-25-5-7
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
peg 6000 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sartomer USA LLC polyethylene glycol (600) diacrylate sr610
a Hamsters were intranasally infected with <t>SARS-CoV-2.</t> <t>MK-4482</t> was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.
Polyethylene Glycol (600) Diacrylate Sr610, supplied by Sartomer USA LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dissolved+macrogol/sr610/us07760614-533-15-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyethylene glycol (600) diacrylate sr610 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a Hamsters were intranasally infected with SARS-CoV-2. MK-4482 was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Orally delivered MK-4482 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in the Syrian hamster model

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22580-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Hamsters were intranasally infected with SARS-CoV-2. MK-4482 was administered pre-infection at 12 and 2 h before infection, or post-infection starting 12 h post-infection. Treatment was continued in both groups every 12 h for 3 consecutive days. Animals were euthanized on day 4 and lungs were harvested. T = treatment (red: pre-infection and black: post-infection treatments); I = infection; S = swab samples and N = necropsy. b Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were collected on days 2 and 4 post-infection and viral shedding determined by RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = >0.9999, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). c Oral swab samples ( N = 6 per group) were titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.5701, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = >0.9999, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). d Lung viral loads ( N = 6 per group) were determined by using RT-PCR ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0189, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.1032, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). e Lung samples ( N = 6 per group) were homogenized and titered for infectious virus (TCID 50 ) on Vero E6 cells. Two independent lung samples were measured from each animal ( N = 12 per group) ( p Value Vehicle vs Pre-treatment = 0.0091, p Value Vehicle vs Post-treatment = 0.0102, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test). b – e Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of Results: b , c No statistical significance in virus shedding (RT-PCR or TCID 50 ) between either of the two MK-4482 treatment groups and vehicle controls. d Significant difference in lung viral loads (RT-PCR) between pre-infection group compared to the vehicle control. Although post-infection group trended towards lower levels, no significant difference between this group and vehicle control. e Infectious titers in the lungs (TCID 50 ) were significantly different between both pre-infection and post-infection groups, compared to vehicle control group, but no significance was found between treatment groups from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.008.

Article Snippet: Groups were then treated with MK-4482 (250 mg/kg) [MedChemExpress dissolved in 10 % polyethylene glycol (PEG)−400; 2.5% Cremophor RH40 in water] at 12 h and 2 h prior to infection (pre-infection group) or 12 h following infection (post-infection group).

Techniques: Infection, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Virus, Control

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used on lung sections to examine lung pathology post-inoculation. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to detect viral antigen in the same lung sections from each animal ( N = 6 per group). a , d , g Untreated vehicle control, ( b , e , h ) pre-infection treatment with antiviral drug MK-4482 and ( c , f , i ) post-infection treatment with MK-4482. ( a – f ) H&E stain ( g , h , i ) IHC for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody. a Lung 20X: multifocal, moderate broncho-interstitial pneumonia. b , c Lung 20X: minimal peribronchial interstitial pneumonia. d Lung 200X epithelial cell necrosis (arrow), edema (asterisk), interstitial pneumonia (arrowhead). e , f peribronchial and interstitial infiltrates (arrow). g Lung 20X; insert 200X: numerous immunoreactive bronchiolar epithelial cells, type I and II pneumocytes and fewer macrophages. h, i Lung 20X; insert 200X: scattered to moderate numbers of immunoreactive bronchiolar epithelial cells, type I and II pneumocytes and macrophages. Pictures were taken in RGB color space (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) with a threshold set to 128. a – c , g – i Scale bar is 200μm. d – f Scale bar is 20μm.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Orally delivered MK-4482 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in the Syrian hamster model

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22580-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used on lung sections to examine lung pathology post-inoculation. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to detect viral antigen in the same lung sections from each animal ( N = 6 per group). a , d , g Untreated vehicle control, ( b , e , h ) pre-infection treatment with antiviral drug MK-4482 and ( c , f , i ) post-infection treatment with MK-4482. ( a – f ) H&E stain ( g , h , i ) IHC for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody. a Lung 20X: multifocal, moderate broncho-interstitial pneumonia. b , c Lung 20X: minimal peribronchial interstitial pneumonia. d Lung 200X epithelial cell necrosis (arrow), edema (asterisk), interstitial pneumonia (arrowhead). e , f peribronchial and interstitial infiltrates (arrow). g Lung 20X; insert 200X: numerous immunoreactive bronchiolar epithelial cells, type I and II pneumocytes and fewer macrophages. h, i Lung 20X; insert 200X: scattered to moderate numbers of immunoreactive bronchiolar epithelial cells, type I and II pneumocytes and macrophages. Pictures were taken in RGB color space (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) with a threshold set to 128. a – c , g – i Scale bar is 200μm. d – f Scale bar is 20μm.

Article Snippet: Groups were then treated with MK-4482 (250 mg/kg) [MedChemExpress dissolved in 10 % polyethylene glycol (PEG)−400; 2.5% Cremophor RH40 in water] at 12 h and 2 h prior to infection (pre-infection group) or 12 h following infection (post-infection group).

Techniques: Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Control, Infection

a A longitudinal cross section of the right lung of each animal ( N = 6 per group) was stained for viral antigen and scanned to measure the total amount of viral antigen present in the lung section. b EIDD-1931 concentrations in the lungs. a , b Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of results. a The area of lung staining positive for viral antigen showed a statistically significant difference between both of the MK-4482 treatment groups, compared to vehicle controls. No difference between individual treatment groups was present. (One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. ** p < 0.008).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Orally delivered MK-4482 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in the Syrian hamster model

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22580-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a A longitudinal cross section of the right lung of each animal ( N = 6 per group) was stained for viral antigen and scanned to measure the total amount of viral antigen present in the lung section. b EIDD-1931 concentrations in the lungs. a , b Blue circle, vehicle control; red square, pre-infection treatment; green triangle, post-infection treatment. Summary of results. a The area of lung staining positive for viral antigen showed a statistically significant difference between both of the MK-4482 treatment groups, compared to vehicle controls. No difference between individual treatment groups was present. (One-way ANOVA followed by Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a pairwise Wilcox test was used to analyze differences among groups. ** p < 0.008).

Article Snippet: Groups were then treated with MK-4482 (250 mg/kg) [MedChemExpress dissolved in 10 % polyethylene glycol (PEG)−400; 2.5% Cremophor RH40 in water] at 12 h and 2 h prior to infection (pre-infection group) or 12 h following infection (post-infection group).

Techniques: Staining, Control, Infection